The Bruja Professor

Which Witch Are You? : Finding Your Magical Self Through Storytelling & Pop Culture Keynote Transcript

Last summer, I had the honor of being one of the keynote speakers for Romancing the Gothic Conference 2023 – The Supernatural and Witchcraft in belief, practice and depiction. Below is the full transcript of the talk, including slides. Video recording coming soon…

Thank you for joining us today, and thank you, Sam [Hirst], for organizing this fantastic conference. This lecture, “Which Witch Are You? : Finding Your Magical Self Through Storytelling and Pop Culture,” will explore how witches in popular culture influence real-world practicing witches like myself, both inviting us to celebrate the counter-culture joy of the craft and to engage with the problematics of making an othered archetype more mainstream. So we’ll be looking at the delights, the horrors, and the delightful horrors of all things witchy in popular culture. 

It would be easy to say that witches are having a moment. You would just have to point to the influx of witchy romance novels and magical paranormal shows or look at the broader conversation surrounding “witch-hunts” (heavy on the air quotes) in our current political landscape. 

But I’m going to let you in on a little not-so-secret secret: Witches might be having a moment, true, but we’ve always been here. And we’ve had other moments. In fact, we owe much of pop culture’s current resurgence in all things witchy to streaming. Thanks to online media, a whole new generation has been exposed to iconic shows like Charmed and Bewitched and films like Practical Magic and The Craft. Now, whimsigoth, a style made iconic by shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, among others, is taking over TikTok and Instagram. We have WitchTok, Witches of Instagram, and more mainstream publications, like Cosmopolitan magazine, writing about astrology, witchcraft, and natural spirituality. 

So the images I have on this slide are, starting in the upper left-hand corner: a photo of The Hoodwitch, a big name for Witches of Instagram. Next to it is a poster for the iconic show Charmed and Sephora’s controversial witch kit that got pulled from the market for a variety of issues, including cultural appropriation.  In the second row, there is an image of Donald Trump calling attacks against him “witch hunts,” which completely turns the phrase inside-out. Then we have an article about whimsigoth fashion on social media, and a selection of witchy romance novels.

And yet, as mainstream as witchy business has become, there are those of us who have always been immersed in natural spirituality and, quite frankly, often eschew the more commodified representations of our practices. There are those of us, in other words, that always felt a little witchy. To quote a meme that’s often passed around witchy social media, “Some of you did not spend your childhoods making potions out of random leaves, berries, and twigs tossed into a tub of water and stirred with a stick you found…and it shows.” 

Seriously though? Half the joy of witchy pop culture is the memes.

Anyway, some of us, like myself, grew up in what I call “hippy woo-woo homes,” where mysticism and everyday magic were normalized. We have roots in conjure folk practices and healing folk practices as well as influences in the modern new age movement. Others are leaving behind mainstream religion and exploring their spirituality in other ways. So we have witchy folk—some of whom gladly take on the term witch, others who have that term applied to them to mark their difference—who have embraced the path as something that has been passed down to us through the generations or found the path through their own search for connection and meaning. Both paths are valid.

All this by way of saying that it’s important to remember here, when we talk about pop culture witches, that there are, in fact, real-world witches. These are lived experiences. Some choose the name witch voluntarily. Others, including conjure folk practitioners and healers, have had the term applied to them. Still others take back the term, choosing to transform the negative connotations into a celebration of hidden or suppressed histories (I am one of these witches).

As a mestiza, a woman of mixed Indigenous, European, and Latine heritage, it’s impossible for the history of colonization in my blood not to shape my spiritual practice. Embracing the term bruja, or witch, is my way of acknowledging how my family history of curanderismo, or folk healing practice, was seen as a transgressive practice, an evil art by the Spanish church at various times throughout history. So I offer up two definitions of witch, though they are by no means the only definitions, just the ones I feel are most suited to this presentation.

The first is from Kristen J. Sollee’s Witches, Sluts, Feminists, which says, "The Witch is at once female divinity, female ferocity, and female transgression." For the purposes of this lecture, I use the term “female” in a gender-inclusive way, as witchy business is often considered anti-patriarchal, queer, and more centered on traditionally feminine attributes, attributes which, regardless of our gender, we can all embody. 

The second definition is from my own blog, Enchantment Learning & Living, and specifically defines the term bruja, or witch, as “an archetype that reclaims the once negative term witch and finds power in her otherness. Brujeria is about taking our power back and honoring our divine right to joy, pleasure, hope, and happiness.” I include this definition here to emphasize the importance of acknowledging that witches of color are often working through layers of reconnecting to our heritage, working through histories of colonization, and reclaiming our right to joy. It’s a narrative that reads a little differently than the white witchcraft that’s most often centered in popular culture.

And while it would be easy to turn this lecture into a celebration of witchcraft, the community isn’t without its dark side. No community is.

I would love to say that all witches are good. But we do, indeed, have our bad witches, the gingerbread-house-living, children-eating, poison-apple-making dark magic practitioners. Only in real life, we call them spiritual gatekeepers (or those who keep others out of the community by saying they’re not pure of blood or enlightened enough), spiritual bypasses (or those who perform feel-good rituals while bypassing serious mental health issues), and, of course, old-fashioned white supremacists…and basically the typical baddies you find in most communities

These issues—the difference between good witches and bad witches—remind me of the question Glenda the Good Witch poses to Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz: “Are you a good witch or a bad witch?”

This is a question worth asking of ourselves. The answer is not as simple as stating you are a Glittery Glenda or a green-skinned Wicked Witch of the West. The heart of the question for real witches is in knowing if you are a transgressive free spirit committed to honoring the wild spirit in others…or if you are a witch who, intentionally or unintentionally, upholds white supremacy, spiritual gatekeeping, spiritual bypassing, cultural appropriation…I could go on, but you get the idea.

Good witches honor their heritage, cultural traditions, and sometimes, the need to cultivate new ones when we are disconnected from our pasts for various reasons stemming from generational trauma to lost histories due to cultural assimilation. Good witches also respect the heritages of others without inappropriately taking from them. Bad witches indulge in cultural appropriation and reinforce the very social norms that they are trying to escape. 

I could complicate this analogy further. I mean, how "good" is Glenda if she's celebrating the fact that Dorothy dropped a house on another witch? If we've learned anything from Wicked, it's that the villain's story is never clean-cut, a theme reinforced by the story arc of Regina, the Evil Queen in Once Upon a Time's reimagining of Snow White. As they often say in that series, evil isn't born, it's made. 

See? Explorations of witchcraft in popular culture are never simple. But they do give us jumping-off points for exploring our own light and dark sides. Our magical sides, too. In fact, The Wizard of Oz lays the groundwork for the idea that witches could, in fact, be cool, pretty, and benevolent, thanks to Glenda the Good Witch, giving us permission, in turn, to be both powerful AND good, even if we don't want to wear a glittery bubble-gum pink ballgown (confession: I do).

We also have the Dorothys, or basic witches like myself, who are everyday folk looking for a little more magic in our lives. For the purposes of this lecture, I want to focus on these basic pop culture witches as figures that can help us heal. They show us that you don’t have to have “pure blood” to be a witch or know what you’re doing. Like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, you just have to take that first step on the yellow brick road, and, with luck, community, and maybe a little song and dance, you’ll discover that you’ve had the power in you all along.

This is an especially important concept for those of us with complicated relationships to our heritage. As we search for our sense of self and empowerment, pop culture witches serve as a reminder that we are magic and can conjure our own path.

You could say I’ve found myself in stories. Now I’m going to give you some very personal examples of how pop culture witches can help us reclaim our sense of self as magical beings so we can see just how powerful seemingly “fun” or “frivolous” stories can be.

The first series I want to discuss is Juliet Blackwell’s Witchcraft Mysteries, featuring the natural witch Lily Ivory. She is currently a vintage clothing shop owner in San Francisco, using her magical abilities to solve paranormal crimes in her adopted city. She grew up in a small town in Texas and, because of her abilities, was chased out at an early age. As a result, she never finished her witchy education with her grandmother Graciela or the curandera her grandmother sent her to when they realized the town was no longer safe for the young witch. 

Although Blackwell didn’t intend for her protagonist to be Latina or Indigenous, it’s impossible not to read Lily Ivory as mestizaje-coded. She reads as having a mixed background with cultural lines that aren’t always easy to untangle, especially in her use of the Spanish language and certain conjure folk practices. Even when I teach the first book in this series in my Witchcraft and Pop Culture class, my students, who are largely Latine, Hispanic, Indigenous, and Mestizaje, also read her as Latina or mestiza. What’s more, they love it! They are always pleasantly surprised to see themselves represented in stories that artfully explore complicated mixed-raced legacies and conjure folk practices—and that are fun and joyful! It's a big departure from the many trauma porn narratives we’re used to seeing ourselves in.

As for me, I found this series when I was a baby witch, away from the Land of Enchantment for the first time, coming to terms with the fact that not everyone grew up in mystically inclined households and grappling with very real cultural differences in a big white city. Blackwell’s series first drew me in because of the glitter on the cover, but it kept me reading because it was perhaps the first time I’d read a mestizaje narrative that grappled with the difficulty of finding a way forward with a fractured heritage and limited cultural education. What’s more, as the series develops, we see Lily finding a wonderful found family, a home, and love—an absolutely magical story for anyone wanting to feel like they, too, can conjure those things.

My second example is a more recent one. Isabel Canas’s The Hacienda is a magnificent gothic romance set in turn-of-the-century Mexico and deftly explores the complexity of our violent colonial history where nothing is romanticized. This gothic romance centers on a mestizo priest who is also a brujo. It is unclear in the story if this man is a curandero, or healer, and a brujo in the eyes of the church only, that is, if his witchy identity is different from this folk healer practice. And that is the beauty of it. Those labels and identities become mixed, so much so that we often can't separate them. There are parts of his cultural history that are lost to him, parts that he must keep hidden, and parts that he intuitively knows. Not going to lie: I felt SEEN.

These stories tell us that we aren’t alone in trying to heal from a tangled past or find ourselves in the present. They remind us that despite the history of trauma in our blood, we can conjure a future full of healing and hope.

We learn to take what we can of our past or heritage—what is nourishing and life-giving—and let go of what is toxic or oppressive. There are things in our backgrounds, family pain, generational trauma, and ancestral hauntings—yes, I said ancestral hauntings, I’ve got to get a little woo-woo, or else what am I doing here? What it all boils down to is that we can’t always go back. Some things are lost to us. Some things are too risky to return to. This is an important reality for many of us and worth emphasizing in a cultural moment that focuses mostly on reclaiming the past and reclaiming our heritage as a form of empowerment. That’s not something many of us can safely do. This leaves us with a burning question:

Where do we go from here?

The answer is simple. We turn to pop culture witches to show us a different way of being. I’m making some sweeping generalizations here—and there’s a lot I’m leaving out—but I want to walk you through the journey of magical selfhood through some of the most iconic witchy archetypes in pop culture. 

For many of us, the journey into the wild woods of witchcraft can be terrifying. That’s where we get the archetype of the scary witches like Baba Yaga, La Huesera, or the Bone Woman, and the witch in the hut in the middle of the forest. But there’s a duality to these figures. Baba Yaga is both the malevolent child-eater and the benevolent savior. 

La Loba, sometimes known as La Huesera, is a benevolent life-giver, collecting the bones of endangered animals to give them new life. She is also a terrifying figure at home in the world of wounded or dying things. Although not technically considered a witch in folklore, La Huesera is definitely treated as such in my novella, Weep, Woman, Weep. Like the more helpful incarnation of Baba Yaga, La Loba or La Huesera in my book is who you go to when you need the kind of help only a witch who means business can give.

The images here are a still of Emma Caufield as the witch in Hansel and Gretel from the TV show Once Upon a Time, a 19th-century Russian illustration of Baba Yaga, and fan art of the Bone Woman by steeringfornorhart.

This terror of the unknown, the fear of leaving the safety of traditional communities, however stifling they are, is best exemplified in 2016 film The Witch, about the horrors of Puritan America. We are as afraid as Thomasin of the menacing figures hidden in the woods and yet, by the end of the film, are eager for her to align with Black Phillip. After all, living deliciously in the woods sounds a lot better than living with a repressed, hypocritical, borderline incestuous family. We want her to go be the witch of the wood!

These scary witches, in other words, represent duality—the darkness and the light of the craft, our hope and fear of the unknown.

And speaking of The Craft…we see these same themes playing out in iconic films. In The Craft (1996), we get the transgressive counter-culture gothiness of a group of teen girls reclaiming their power through the craft AND we get a cautionary tale, reminding us not to recreate oppressive structures once we’re the ones with power. Empowerment is terrifying—and it comes with a certain amount of responsibility, namely ensuring you aren't getting your empowerment at the expense of someone else’s autonomy.

The message is clear: Always magic responsibly. 

This terror of transgression and the unknown is all part of the process, the first step in moving beyond mainstream religion or even conventional norms—it's scary! Even if you are a basic witch like me. And for some of us, we’re always walking the fine line of being terrified of our own agency and autonomy and empowered by it. We’re also always negotiating being viewed as the child-eating demon or the benevolent fairy godmother.

It’s once we get past the terrors of this archetype, things get really interesting.

Thanks to the silver screen, we enter an era in which witches aren’t just terrifying. They’re sexy…and kind of fun! And while there are issues with inappropriately sexualizing othered bodies, the sexy witch, to my mind, is a bold transgressive figure, especially when that witch is Veronica Lake. In I Married a Witch (1942), she’s seductive, she’s fun, and she’s…harmless. 

I won’t bother going into the plot of this film since it is nonsensical and quickly unravels. Do we care? No! All we care about is Veronica Lake as a sexy witch running circles around the basic bitch politician love interest. She dazzles! She delights! She makes us feel playful and magical. More: She gives us permission to be empowered by our sexuality. 

Veronica Lake also ushers in an era of witches who aren’t terrifying creatures of the wild wood or green-skinned monsters. Witches, we learn, look just like ordinary people. Only very, very sexy ordinary people.

These are just some examples of the legacy of the sexy witch in popular culture, like Kim Novak in Bell, Book, and Candle (1958), the polyamorous coven in The Witches of Eastwick (1987), cursed family in the soapy The Witches of East End (2013), and witches in paranormal and urban fantasy books—they get to be sexy AND badass in Kim Harrison’s Dead Witch Walking and Yasmine Galenorn’s Witchling.

Significantly here, with the exception of Bell, Book and Candle, these narratives show that witches are allowed to be empowered sexual beings, magical beings, and human beings. So, too, are we.

And yeah, I know we can’t always be at our sexy witchy best 100% of the time, and the idea of sexiness is so fraught for many of us, which brings us to the most dynamic and relatable witch of pop culture: The Basic Witch. This figure goes all the way back to Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, the iconic every girl (I use this term gender inclusively). 

As Glenda tells Dorothy at the end of The Wizard of Oz, “You've always had the power my dear, you just had to learn it for yourself.” This is now a common Basic Witch trope in witchy narratives--the average person realizing they are magic--and, I think, it's so popular because sometimes we need to remember our profound capacity for magic-making.

This figure gets reborn with Samantha in Bewitched. The witch is not just evil or sexy. She’s now the girl next door. Her casserole will put a spell on you!

By the 90s, we can’t escape the meta parts of witch media. Charmed was made possible by The Craft, both of which were made possible by The Witches of Eastwick, all of which were made possible by Bewitched. Lastly, all of them look at modern witches as everyday women.

So much of what we think of when we think of modern witches, however, are rooted in two iconic texts: The original Charmed series and the film Practical Magic. When Charmed first aired in 1998 it did a radical thing by making witches normal (white) women struggling to pay the rent, get a job that makes them happy, figure out how to date when you have powers, and learning how to have a relationship with your adult siblings that isn’t rooted in childhood spats. They explored issues of childbirth, breastfeeding in public, and working parenthood. So relatable! While the show wasn't without its problems, primarily with representation, it made the witch a fun, flirty, SAFE figure in mainstream media.

The sisters in Practical Magic took that one step further by opening up the magical sisterhood to anyone who is magically inclined, not just natural witches. And thus, a new era of witches supporting witches was born. Just make sure you’re on their phone tree. In addition to Charmed and Practical Magic, I have a few other examples here like Sabrina the Teenage Witch, witchy romances, and a few witchy cozy mysteries that all emphasize being basic (sexy) witches to illustrate how common this archetype becomes in media.

There are some legitimate issues associated with being a basic witch, however, most of which were already outlined in my Wicked Witch spiel at the start of this lecture—cultural appropriation, spiritual gatekeeping, and so much more, especially when the Basic Witch is so often a skinny white het-cis able-bodied young woman.

These issues beg the question: Who is safe being othered? 

In recent romance novel discourse, an important question arose: Should you write a witchy story set in a small town today that doesn’t meaningfully address the suppression of conjure folk practices, violence against people with historically marginalized identities, or America’s violent history? That is, is it offensive to leave those histories out of our feel-good cozy witch stories?

My hot take? It’s complicated. We do need to expand the narrative beyond white feminism, I mean white witches, I mean white feminism. But many creators writing these stories, to my mind, aren’t being malicious—they aren’t Wicked Witches silencing othered voices. I think they’re writing love letters to stories like Practical Magic, Charmed, and other whimsigoth narratives that defined a generation. While many of these texts were transgressive and transformative for their time, they are also dated now, which illustrates how these proverbial love letters to these texts might also feel dated even though they were more recently written. 

These writers, in short, are writing stories with the understanding that witches are fictional characters—not real people with lived experiences. That is, their stories are pure fantasy that, like any fantasy, can (un)intentionally reinforce the status quo. The more we understand that witches are real and not mythological beings, the more magical—and powerful—we can make witchy stories. Still, I totally get wanting to read a low-stakes story about magical stuff that feels like an escape from real-world traumas, which is what I think a lot of these romantasy and cozy paranormal mysteries are trying to do.

Still, I’m forever grateful for stories like Celestine Martin’s Witchful Thinking, which celebrates BIPOC joy and whimsy within a cozy paranormal small-town setting. It goes a long way to normalizing BIPOC magic and reminds us that we deserve to be centered in enchanting stories with HEAs where the stakes are not surviving genocide or dismantling systemic oppression but in finding love and learning to be brave.

I’ve included a few other examples of books that explore witchcraft through the lens of intersectional identities: A Spell for Trouble (a black witchy mermaid cozy mystery series), Cemetery Boys (a trans-Latinx story), Labyrinth Lost (a series about brujas), and Black Witch Magic (a BIPOC interracial romance). 

Even shows like The Witches of East End, a soapy paranormal drama, do an important thing by elevating domestic life and reminding us that our day-in, day-out is nothing short of a magical, maybe even telenovela-worthy, narrative. This is an image of the kitchen in The Witches of East End. It is FABULOUS. I've paired it with a meme that says, “girls only want one thing and it's the Practical Magic house.” These stories remind us just how gorgeous witchy houses are and, in turn, that we should treat our homes as sacred sanctuaries. They are so magical, in fact, they have a fandom separate from the texts that birthed them. But, I digress…

Yes, it’s a problem when witches are seen through a lens of white feminism. But guess what? Many of these texts are also celebratory—if in a coded way—for people with historically marginalized identities.

At the time, Bewitched (1964) was a radical and subversive look at interracial relationships via the story of a witch married to a mortal. That said, white witches as stand-ins for other races is incredibly dated now, and borderline offensive, but at the time the original series aired? Revolutionary. And who can forget the iconic line in Practical Magic, “Good news, Sally just came out!” So many witchy stories are queer-coded though I'd like to see more queer witchy stories that are text and not subtext, like the series The Bastard Son and The Devil Himself.

But most significantly…these figures give us permission to conjure a way forward when we are unable to make a home in our ancestral or familial past. What’s more, they show us that our basic lives are basically magical, thanks to gorgeous settings, iconic styles, and a general belief that the best magic is in finding your people, the ones who will help you be your best magical self.

Which leads us to my final, and most important of questions: Which witch are you? Are you a good witch or a bad witch—and how would you define those terms? Are you a wicked witch or a sexy witch or basic witch? Or does it depend on the day? Do you freely take on the term of witch or has the term been applied to you? Or do you prefer another word for your magical self? Mermaids, too, are having a moment. 

Pop culture is so in love with witches, in fact, that we even have Buzzfeed quizzes to help us figure out the kind of witch we are and helpful social media-friendly infographics explaining “definitively” (heave on the air quotes) what types of witches exist in the world. 

Regardless of your answer, if you showed up today, one thing is likely clear: You are a witch. As they say in Practical Magic, “there’s a little witch in all of us.” Pop culture witches help us find that spark within ourselves and nourish it.

As for me, I’ve started thinking of myself as a story witch. A story witch is a fantastical being who knows that stories are some of the deepest forms of magic, and the narratives we tell about ourselves are spells. We find ourselves in stories as we are drawn to the books, shows, and movies that help us work through the plot twists in our lives. We use them to nourish and heal—and to craft enchanting stories of our own. See what I mean? Magic!

Under my story witch image here are books I’ve written about magical living and story magic. I can safely say that everything I’ve written is a spell, a conjuring to help me reimagine my life as something abundant and joyful. 

Thank you so much for coming to my lecture. As I wrap things up, I leave you with this final spell: I encourage each and every one of you to explore your witchy side, even if it makes you a little nervous. It’s worth the journey, I promise you. I mean…who doesn’t want to live deliciously?

Thank you, again.

Here is the short list of works I consulted for this presentation. 

Any questions?

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram and Facebook. Here’s to a magical life!

The Magic of Witchy Houses in Popular Culture

It should come as no surprise that I am trash for a witchy house. I have Pinterest boards full of witchy decor ideas for my forever home, and my for-now home looks like a cozy hobbit hole behind an unassuming apartment door—a hobbit hole if said hobbit was into crystals, herbs, and other witchy goodness.

It me. I am that hobbit.

I’m not alone in this obsession. Not a Halloween season goes by that I don’t see the meme that, quite accurately states, “There’s only one thing girls witches want and that’s the Practical Magic House.” Although the house doesn’t really exist—the facade was built exclusively for the film and then taken down—IT IS FOREVER REAL IN OUR HEARTS.

This, I can assure you, is a FACT.

Seriously, what witch hasn’t modeled their dream home after the house in Practical Magic? The plant room alone makes me swoon!

And it’s not the only magical house that has fired up our witchy hearts. We have the Halliwell Manor in the original Charmed and the reboot, not to mention one of my personal favorites, the gorgeous abode in The Witches of East End (2013), the outside of which, incidentally, is the same house in the Charmed reboot. Even shows like The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, The Addams Family franchise, and the recent Mayfair Witches are popular in part because of the gothic magical vibes of their interiors. We want to live in these houses!

This is not even getting into the glory of the fairytale witch house, from Baba Yaga’s home that sits on chicken feet to the strange hut buried deep in an enchanted forest that may be made of gingerbread or moss-covered stones but will always be full of magic and more than a little menace. Or the cottagecore vibes of the witches in Terry Pratchett’s Wyrd Sisters series…and so, so many more.

But why? What makes us love witchy houses in popular culture so much? Other than the fact that they are magical life goals, I mean. OBVIOUSLY.

As the bruja professor, I have a few theories about that…

Witchy Homes as Wild Sanctuary

First, I think it’s essential that we revisit Terri Windling’s lovely essay, “The Folklore of Hearth and Home.” In it, Windling draws on Jungian psychology to illustrate that homes are archetypal spaces, reflections of our psyche. It makes (magical and mundane) sense that our homes are the deepest reflection of who we are. Similarly, in her essay, “Wild Sanctuary,” Windling explores how Marie-Louise von Franz situates the wild wood of folklore as, in part, a reflective healing space the protagonist goes to when the outside world seems too complicated. I think, in many ways, the home can be a type of wild wood or magical realm we escape to when the world feels too fraught, the day-in, day-out too tiring. When we pair these two ideas together—home as archetypal psychic space and wild wood as sanctuary—we can see that the home becomes the site of our inner world, the place we retreat to in order to heal and reflect—and imagine a more magical way of being.

Pop culture pops out the concept of witchy houses as wild sanctuaries behind four walls and a door. It’s where we can be our more authentic selves, strip off the armor of the world, and just be. It’s also where we can tend our internal lives and our private lives…

More than that, the magical houses of literature, shows, and movies emphasize the domestic sphere as a sacred space.

Centering the Feminine Experience

The home, the private sphere, is often associated with the feminine. Most often, it is held secondary to the public sphere or masculine realm. I’m really trying hard not to do a deep dive into my graduate school work on 18th- and 19th-century courtship novels here, but I will say this: The courtship novel, like witchy media, is a genre that focuses on the domestic, the personal, and the private lives which are too often viewed as less-than in comparison with more traditionally masculine, extroverted narratives. Guess what? Both courtship novels and witchy media typically center on the feminine experience. Guess what else? The feminine experience is often seen as less important than the typical hero’s journey.

SHOCKER.

I mean, he goes out into the world and does stuff. She stays home and embroiders cushions. At least, that’s the stereotype, one that completely disregards women’s labor (both physical and emotional) and the importance of our internal lives. Regardless of your gender identity, I think everyone can benefit from celebrating the feminine aspects of their character. We all have both masculine and feminine archetypal energy within us, what Jung called the Anima and the Animus, and while some of his ideas on this are dated (um…what isn’t???), it’s important to remember that we all have a multitude of gender expressions within us. So when I speak of the witchy home as a uniquely feminine space, I’m not ignoring male-identifying witches or anyone who isn’t het-cis, etc., but rather celebrating what we all love about these houses, which is how they acknowledge the power of the traditionally coded-female domestic space and encourage us to honor the feminine-coded aspects of self.

Honoring the domestic sphere is just as important for men or people who don’t identify as women. I’m thinking, to draw once again on courtship novels, of Edward Ferrars in Sense & Sensibility. His mother wants him to be a stylish London lawyer. He, on the other hand, is quite at home in the domestic realm and ends up earning a living in a job that is much more suited to quite domestic pursuits. Let’s be real: Edward Ferrars is an introvert. And we can all relate to wanting a quite sanctuary to feel our feels in a world that wants us to be loud, extroverted, and masculine (yes, even Girl Bosses get burned out!).

But back to the heart of this essay—or should I say HEARTH?

Witchy stories and the houses they take place in have the magical ability to center women’s lives and see mundane things as, actually, quite enchanting. They go further to emphasize that often that stories that get swept under the rug are some of the most interesting, and the spaces we occupy carry the daily joys and dramas within their walls. I mean, who hasn’t buried an ex or two under the rose bushes? Who doesn’t hide their grimoire behind the fine china? Or bake a little spell into their brownies? Or go tell the bees important news? Just me?

The original Charmed is one of the longest-running TV series that centers on female protagonists. It covers everything from growing up in a non-traditional household, the dating lives of women (the joys and terrors), to starting your own business, going back to college as a non-traditional student, to getting married and having children, juggling work, kids, and saving the world, not to mention breastfeeding in public—you get the idea. So much happens in that house. Births, deaths, birthday parties, exorcisms…sure, it’s a show about magic and good versus evil, but, at its heart, it’s a show about sisters. And the lives of women.

Halliwell Manor in the original Charmed (1998) really put the whimsy in whimsygoth.

The Personal is Political…and Magical

The final part of this VERY FORMAL STUDY on witchy houses is that they allow us to see our everyday lives as magical. Like the classic courtship novel that showcase how the personal is political (to borrow the phrase coined by Carol Hanisch in 1970), the witchy home explores how outer world issues (sexism, racism…seriously, pick your -ism) play out within a smaller, more confined scope—and how individual agency can create change when we feel helpless in the face of so much STUFF.

We have our gothic elements—the nightmares and demons, both literal and proverbial, that echo in our psyches and spaces—as well as the hopeful conjurings that make life more enchanting. These homes boldly make subtext text. The stuff we’re working through in our psyches become the demons and monsters we fight, the curses we break, the spells we cast. The monsters in The Charmed reboot (2018), for example, aren’t just ice demons but predators of the #MeToo variety (yeah, it’s a little on the nose, but what paranormal series following the Buffy the Vampire Slayer lineage isn’t?). Similarly, our personal breakthroughs have communal significance, like Sally “coming out” as a witch at the end of Practical Magic…if that’s not queer-coded, I don’t know what is. Or that fact that the sisters break the family curse, ending generational trauma for not only themselves but the next generation. See? The personal is not only political here but magical when we recognize our profound capacity as individuals to conjure change simply by being attuned to our truest selves (I could get into a lot about witches and social justice practices here, but that’s an essay for another time).

The Halliwells in both series aren’t just sisters or witches, but the Charmed Ones, and only by reconnecting in their ancestral home can they activate their powers, which speaks to the power of family, home, and ancestry on our futures. The sisters (again with the sisters!) in both Practical Magic and The Witches of East End are as bound to their home as they are to the curses that control their lives. In all of these examples, the home is the safe space, the sanctuary where these witches go to seek refuge from the evils of the world. Granted, the home in the original Charmed is often invaded by baddies, but that’s because it sits on a magical nexus of sorts which is basically a homing become for all things magical, so what are you going to do? All homes have their quirks.

The Witches of East End (2013) has to feature one of my all-time favorite witchy houses!

Even in The Love Witch (2016), Elaine’s absolutely gorgeous home aesthetic is meant to contrast directly with her destructive nature. Sure, on the surface, she’s love and light….but underneath all that, she’s a toxic, traumatized individual who copes by inflicting that same trauma on others. But her house is so pretty! This is a great example of how her personal empowerment comes at the expense of others…not so magical, even if it looks good on the surface.

While we can empathize with how terribly she’s been exploited and abused, we also can’t condone the fact that her quick fix for healing trauma is to become the predator. Still, her home, filled with jewels, and herbs, and other spell-crafting material, is * chef’s kiss *. The home in this movie is a cautionary tale: Don’t confuse the witchy aesthetic with living right…but when you can be an ethical witch AND have your witchy aesthetic, too? That is truly magical!

Elaine casting her toxic spells and looking fantastic doing it in The Love Witch (2016).

So, on the one hand, we have the gothic elements of our lives literally hanging on the walls in our homes, like a terrible ex hexed into a painting for punishments and safekeeping (hello, The Witches of East End), and the proverbial ghosts of the people who came before us and other spirits (cough, cough, The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina). On the other, we have the absolute joy, the whimsy, the magic of gorgeous homes that are not only feasts for the senses but actually look lived in like in Practical Magic. Buh-bye, ultracold modernism! We want spaces that are loving, warm, and downright mystic.

What in the Whimsigoth?

Let’s face it, a huge part of what makes these stories so enjoyable is the aesthetics. Dancing from whimsigoth to cottagecore to retro glam, witchy homes embody the aspiration fantasy of what our lives can be (just, you know, don’t use your powers for evil or whatever).

They illustrate that our sanctuaries are magical spaces worthy of the time and attention it takes to make them sacred and healing expressions of self. They remind us that our daily lives can be imbued with magic—that everything, even down to washing dishes in a GORGEOUS kitchen, can be a form of spell work (cleansing spell, anyone?). The home is a space where you go to be your most magical and most yourself, protection wards in place, kettle on, family at the dinner table, grimier safely tucked away in the attic.

An Ode to Witch Homes

So much comes from nurturing these domestic spaces, so it only makes sense that we’ve fallen in love with books and films that romanticize our sanctuaries. I mean, doesn’t it just make sense that our private spaces should be works of art and lovingly tended? 

It also quite subtly addresses women’s labor (traditionally): the magic of a well-made soup, the quiet conjuring of cleaning the house or caring for the familiars, I mean, pets, under your care, not to mention the power of a shared pot of tea and a leisurely conversation. Much can be worked through, much conjured over an afternoon cup of chamomile.

In many ways, we remember the houses more than the plot of specific stories. Like The Big City in a romcom, houses are the third protagonist of any good witchy story. Conversely, like The Small Town (very, very idealized) in a romcom, a house in a witchy story reminds us of the quiet, simple magic of daily life—no need to go to far-flung places to search for magic. It’s right in front of us. Homes are where we spend most of our time, where we are most ourselves. At the end of the day, these witchy homes remind us who we want to be—who we can be, what we can conjure, if only we remember we are magic.

Fun fact: This home is featured as the exterior for both The Witches of East End home and the Charmed reboot home.

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!

What's the Deal with WitchTok?

WitchTok. It’s a thing. And like all things having a cultural moment, there are good and bad things associated with the phenomena. 

It’s not that I don’t love what social media has done for these communities, but I do think it’s important to make it clear that it’s all sweet manifestations and positive affirmations. On the one hand, I absolutely love the fact that people can be more open about “alternative” forms of spirituality (read: anything that’s not institutionalized religion), but that doesn’t mean that it’s all love and light.

It’s not. 

And there are very real issues people have to understand so they don’t end up recreating the hot mess of institutionalized religions, including fear-mongering, spiritual bypassing, and run-of-the-mill performativity. (Quick side note: I’m talking about the bad stuff here and know that some people have been able to find meaning and goodness in these things. I’m not one of them, but more power to you if they’ve been helpful to you in some way.) In other words, just because witchcraft is a historically marginalized spiritual practice doesn’t mean it’s without problems, many of which I outline in this article.

I’ve been marinating on these issues after a recent interview on WitchTok by PBS Subcultures which offered a celebratory look at this pop culture phenomenon and the witches who have helped create safe online witchy communities. I especially appreciated how this segment made sure to point out ways to avoid cultural appropriation (a HUGE problem in the community) and that many of the WitchTok influencers that were interviewed seemed to be more aware and working within their own cultural practices. Yay!

Still, with full respect to the creators of this piece, I do want to take a little time to unpack the dark side of WitchTok. Overall, it was a thoughtful piece that focused on the very best parts of the WitchTok community, which is important given how often these marginalized communities are often villainized or misrepresented and, let’s be real, Halloween is a great time to introduce people to the concept of IRL witches. Who isn’t more open to new ideas come spooky season? And who wouldn’t like to know that some of their favorite story archetypes can also be…actual people with actual lived experiences?

So I guess this is my way of saying that I’m not some salty old crone who gets her kicks going around roasting the baby witches of TikTok. But I do think it’s important to teach people (I’m the bruja professor, after all) how to critically engage with witchy media. It’s not about choosing between loving or hating these subcultures or validating or decrying WitchTok (or social media in general). It’s about joyfully problematizing issues within these communities. It’s also about providing the historical context surrounding such conversations, including how streaming has introduced a new generation to witchy media that, in turn, has inspired a new wave of witches. And it’s about unpacking the nuances of a dynamic, evolving, and complex phenomenon.

I want my students especially to feel like they leave my classes with a clear sense of the beauty and wonder of these communities, but also the very real pitfalls and dangers. That’s the only way we can embrace the joyful and meaningful while also dismantling the hidden systemic oppression and other toxicities within these subcultures.

So…what does this have to do with WitchTok?

Well, let’s look at it this way. I think it’s great that witchy business is having a pop culture moment. Normalizing our communities keeps us safe and encourages others to explore their spirituality in ways that might be more fruitful to them than mainstream religion. Social media has gone a long way to making that possible.

At the same time, precisely because social media is so open, it can become a breeding group for misinformation, cultural appropriation, and general spiritual no-nos like sharing rituals from closed practices or practices that aren’t meant to be shared publicly or outside your circle (however you might define that—it could be your local or virtual coven or even your solitary self). There’s also the weird stuff of teaching people how to perform coercive love spells or summon demons…just don’t. It never ends well. Literally, any B horror movie will tell you this.

It’s also not as easy to say all witches are about social justice, including inclusion and religious freedom. Ideally, yes, we are. But there are still plenty of witches that engage in white supremacy and cultural appropriation, for example, or exhibit the kind of ignorant zealotry that suggests science and spirituality can’t coexist. Take the whole #WitchesWearMasks phenomenon. It started within the community to counter conspiracy-theory level panic about vaccines, masking, and modern medicine’s approach to curbing the worst of the pandemic. Many of us began using the hashtag to remind people that spirituality and science work hand-in-hand, and you can manifest your way out of getting sick in the way you can prevent the spread of disease by masking, social distancing, and good hygiene practices. 

Lastly, there’s also the issue of performativity. Yes, I like social media. Yes, I think it’s important for connecting people and disseminating information. Yes, I think we’re all performers in one way or another the minute we step outside our sanctuaries. But the dark side of this is that we can get lost in the performativity of an app rather than focusing on meaningful connections. This isn’t a particularly new or brilliant concept, but it bears repeating: there’s a fine line between reaching viewers and getting lost in the trap of creating content to appease algorithms. When creators rely solely on those algorithms, the things that say certain hashtags, songs, and subjects are trending, you start creating to feed the machine rather than coming from an authentic place. Hey, I’m not saying algorithms aren’t important—just that they shouldn’t be the sole motivating force behind creation.

Let’s give a few non-witchy examples of what I’m talking about here. A recent New York Times article explored how bad dates are great for TikTok content. On the surface, that’s kind of fun. We get to relate over bad dates, feel connected to a community that’s also searching for love, and generally feel better about the struggle to find The One(s). Yes, if these creators continue to make bad date content because it’s going viral, at what point do they become part of the problem? That is, at what point do they continue to date just so they have content to share, content that will hopefully continue to go viral? That’s not authenticity—it’s setting up prospective dates who unwittingly will become fodder for a creator’s feed.

We see the same issue with WithTok. We have to question at what point a beautifully crafted ritual or aesthetic is more authentic to the witch or the creator…that is, most of us witches don’t look camera ready when we’re making magic, and it’s important to remember that a lot of the “flawless” spell-casters out there don’t look like that when the camera is off either.

In another recent article, many begin to question how the rise of therapy talk in situations outside of the therapy room is hurting relationships. A large part of this is because of short TikTok videos from therapists advocating for clinical, almost corporate scripts to talk about relationship issues with friends and other loved ones. On the one hand, we can say, “Yay! I’m so glad to see therapy is normalized in this way!” On the other, a lot of people are missing and appropriating important terminology that should really only be used within a therapeutic context. Too many people bandy about words they don’t understand or try to use TikTok scripts to deal with complex situations—neither of which are ultimately healthy.

The same issue plays out in WitckTok. We get quick soundbites that offer self-care in the form of spell work or witchy business as an antidote to things like stress, depression, and anxiety. I get the allure of that—we all want magical solutions to mundane problems. But the problem is that WitchTok can sell conjure practices as a cure-all for serious issues that need professional attention. That, my readers, is not so magical, as it can make people feel like there is something wrong with them for not being able to manifest their troubles away or, perhaps worse, sell the illusion that you can do just that.

And yet…

I love that WitchTok is reviving this like whimsigoth, the fashion trend inspired by 80s and 90s witches (it makes it soooooo much easier to find home decor and fashion pieces). Basically, a whole lot of this phenomenon has to do with the fact that a new generation of viewers has been exposed to shows like the original Charmed and movies like Practical Magic, thanks to streaming and a lot of time at home during the pandemic.

Similarly, WitchTok, and social media more generally, is generating more interest in cottagecore lifestyles thanks to Instagram-worthy photos of That Bucolic Life. Truth? I am so here for inspirational reels that romanticize “roughing it” with zero understanding of what actual roughing looks like (yes, even cottagecore vibes and whimsigoth have their problems). Still…It’s aspirational. It’s fantasy. It’s just plain fun!

The problem comes when we treat WitchTok—or any group—as a monolith. It’s not. It’s got great things going on. It’s also got really bad things going on, and a whole bunch of stuff in the middle gray area. And it’s a gentle reminder, in the midst of witches trending on the internet, that we’ve been around for a long time and will still be around when the internet buzz around us has faded. The witches on this app haven’t invented anything. They’ve just made some things more visible to a new audience for better AND for worse.

Bottom line: Enjoy what’s there to enjoy on WitchTok, and social media more generally, and be mindful of its dark side so you don’t get stuck there. And remember that when WitchTok gets tired of whimsigoth and moves on to The Next Big Thing, the rest of us will still be living that low-key witchy life, loving our whimsigoth vibes and cottagecore aspirations. When the internet gets tired of watching videos of appropriated conjure practices or sus love spells, the rest of us witches will keep doing what we’ve already been doing all along: Making magic, even—especially?—when it can't be easily captured in a glossy click-bait video.

And who knows? Maybe some of those witches of TikTok will still be practicing, too.

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!

Engaging with Problematic Content with Latisha Jones

Readers of The Bruja Professor know I am all about having joyful, productive, and nuanced conversations about the stories we love. Sometimes it seems that it can be so fashionable to roast a thing because you don’t like it, don’t understand it, won’t engage with content that’s had PROBLEMS (to put it mildly), or because you woke up on the wrong sid of the bed. Others will sing the praises of a thing, defending a story TO THE DEATH against naysayers while ignoring huge red flags in the content simply because they don’t want to deal with the fact that a beloved author might have some serious skeletons in their closet. In either case, the message is clear: There shall be no productive conversations here today!

But where’s the fun in those one-dimensional conversations? To me, there is little joy in shutting down any potential for an opportunity to grow and expand our worldview simply by being willing to explore to engage with the discomfort surrounding problematic texts (and, in case you forgot, there’s no such thing as a problem-free text). Part of this, I think, comes from the fact that we don’t want to be judged for what we like, as those of us who love genre media and pop culture so often are. We also don’t want to feel guilty for still enjoying that piece of media from our childhood that hasn’t aged well. Others likewise don’t want what they enjoy to be “ruined” by analysis.

But, as my students find, you can both love a thing and be critical of it, appreciate what is to be appreciated AND acknowledge places where a text fall short or is representative of the time in which it was produced. You can also have a lot of fun analyzing popular culture! In fact, thinking critically about media can deepen your enjoyment of it. Just ask my internet friends, many of whom have been guest contributors on this blog—and my IRL friends, too!

We’ve already talked about the art of joyful problematization with Andrea Martucci, host of Shelf Love on the blog, which offers an excellent way to have fun analyzing media. Today, I want to add to that conversation with another wonderful podcast host, Latisha Jones, host of Interspectional Podcast. Just listening to her talk to her variety of super cool guests highlights the importance of having nuanced, balanced, and, most of all, fun and generative conversations about media and how it shapes the world around us.

For example, Latisha often talks about the rule of “two truths,” or recognizing that two things can be true about one text. Let’s try two truths about pop culture to see what we’re talking about here:

Pop culture is wonderful!

Pop culture is trash!

Both are true. It’s impossible to ignore how powerful and affirming pop culture can be, but that power goes both ways—it can be inspiring or make you see the worst in humanity. And, those two things—wonder and trash—are relative, depending on the context, point of view, and personal investment.

Here’s another round of two truths:

Pop culture subverts the status quo!

Pop culture reinforces the status quo!

Again, both these things are FACTS. Sometimes, pop culture is so powerful it can change the status quo, literally normalizing certain narratives that were formally seen as taboo or unheard of. For example, The Mary Tyler Moore Show of the 70s was one of the first shows to normalize the story of the “working girl,” a beloved TV show narrative that continues to this day.

But, we’re also seeing a ton of media that reinforces the status quo of that now ubiquitous working girl storyline that still mostly focuses on thin young hetcis white women. So in one way, The Mary Tyler Moore Show was a trailblazer, but the stories that followed are less revolutionary because they depict only the same kind of woman having that empowered narrative. Other shows, like Insecure (2016), reinvent that story as an exploration of how to be a confident, empowered black woman…when you feel anything but. Now, it is no longer just a narrative about a young white girl (mary Tyler Moore) making her way in a man’s world, but what it means to be a successful black woman in a post-Trump world.

See? Nothing is simple when it comes to pop culture. But it’s worth taking a deep dive into the stories that we love so we can see how they shape our understanding of ourselves and the world around us—for better and worse. And, if you haven’t already, PLEASE listen to Interpsectional Podcast, where Latisha expertly guides listeners through the delightfully nerdy conversations surrounding the problematics media that we love, that we sometimes love to hate, or that we hate to love. Hey, our relationship with media is complicated! And that’s okay.

But if you ever do struggle to engage with problematic content, particularly media that you feel conflicted about, Latisha has some fantastic tips for engaging with it all while developing our critical thinking skills and having fun unpacking the delightfully messy world of pop culture. Check out what Latisha has to say about engaging with problematic content in her lecture below.

Guest Contributor Bio

Latisha Jones is a writer, actress, filmmaker and theater educator. Born in New York, but raised in the DMV area, Latisha earned her bachelor’s degree in screenwriting and playwriting from Drexel University and her master’s degree in Educational Theater from New York University. As a theater educator, she had worked with students of all ages with a specialty in multicultural education. She has developed an anti-racism seminar series called “Difficult Conversations” which focuses on using theater techniques as a method of community development, encouraging dialogue and fostering understanding between people of various ages, classes and cultures. She worked as a consultant and facilitator for various theaters, non-profit organizations and community groups actively working to deconstruct and rebuild themselves in an anti-oppression framework.

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!

Love Potions, Spells & Romantic Conjurings in Pop Culture

It’s Valentine’s Day season so that means we’re thinking about love. True love. True lust. Happily Ever Afters. Happy For Nows. Broken hearts and hopeful gazes. And anyone who has ever suffered through the dumpster fire that is the dating world is also likely thinking about—wishing for?—some sort of magical potion or spell that would make the search for love just a little easier.  Make us feel more confident. Sexier. Attractive—or somehow able to attract the kind of partner we’re looking for. 

It’s the kind of wishful thinking that’s ripe for storytelling. In stories, we get all the fun of indulging in this too-good-to-be-true magical solution to our mundane romantic woes and none of the risks. One carefully cast spell could make the person you’re crushing on fall for you, like in Teen Witch (1989). Side effects include better outfits and epic dance-offs. And a conscience. Eventually, if you are at all a good person, you have to realize that giving your crush the equivalent of a magical roofie probably isn’t the best way to find true love. 

Or maybe, if you’re not quite as wholesome as our little teen witch, that’s exactly what you want to do, as The Love Witch (2016) plays out. It’s less about the man and more about the need to be the center of someone’s world. To take power in being an object of desire. Of course, that too, has its side effects, like spontaneous combustion and downward-spiraling insanity for those hit with our love witch’s magic. That’s the thing with manufactured love: It can never be sustained.  Like a bad come-on line, it never quite works and always leaves you feeling a little sullied.  

Cooking up edible love spells…

Sometimes, though, love spells are accidental.  Sometimes, you accidentally cook all your passionate feelings into your quail with rose sauce, so your whole family (except the icy matriarchy) feels so much overpowering passion that your sister sheds her clothes, causes the outhouse to burst into flames, and runs away with a passing soldier.  Or maybe that’s just the case for the heroine in Like Water for Chocolate, both Laura Esquivel’s book and the film adaptation (both 1992), but which the film so exquisitely depicts. Sometimes we conjure the thing we feel we can’t have and others benefit from that unintentional enchantment. Food is one of the most common forms of spell-work after all, as we take ingredients and our feelings and stir them into something magical.

Sometimes, wishes are small quiet things written under the guise of protecting your heart, like the chocolate witch in Laura Florand’s The Chocolate Kiss (2012) where wishes can be whispered into chocolat chaud and love is as sweet and sensuous as a handcrafted macaron…if you can let your guard down enough to be tempted. Or this love magic is born from desperation and a desire to be simply irresistible to the person you’re crushing on, just like the budding chef in Simply Irresistible (1999). Clearly, food magic is a topic for a whole other essay, but for now, let’s just say that food and love are closely linked.

We also have romantic spells born out of heartfelt pain.  Take little Sally Owens in the 1998 film adaptation of Practical Magic, for example.  Love is unpredictable, something that makes you wild—a terrifying thought for a young girl who wants nothing more than a normal life.  And yet, as we’ll later see, she unconsciously conjures the one wild, unpredictable thing that will make her normal life worth living—and just a little more magical.  

And sometimes, these love spells are about self-love, in the form of sensual body lotions, like in Tasha L. Harrison’s A Taste of Her Own Medicine (2019).  The heroine slathers herself in her own magical concoction not to seduce the man she’s lusting after, but to give herself permission to be a passionate woman and to revel in her own sensuality.  Her love potion, of sorts, is for her and her alone—and leads to fantastic consequences as she learns to open herself to love. That’s what makes it the best kind of love spell.

What you need is Love Potion No. 9…

One of the most iconic and hilarious examples of love spells in popular culture is the 1992 movie Love Potion No. 9, based on the song of the same name.  It’s got it all, from the frothy wish-fulfillment fun of taking dating anxiety off the table and being able to get whoever you want without really having to try.  It’s also got the inevitable downside of anything that seems too good to be true, namely the consent issues inherent in any type of love magic that’s designed to manipulate someone else.  Love Potion No. 9 expertly grapples with these issues in the way only a cheesy 90s movie can—with gusto and some genuine B movie wisdom.

Seriously, what doesn’t this movie have? It’s got magical potions! It’s got romantic fantasies galore! It’s got Sandra Bullock! And strange gypsies! (Yeah, I guess “gypsy” is kind of considered a slur now for the Romani, but that doesn’t stop pop culture from using the gypsy other as a catch-all term for “strange non-white magics” in the same way they use voodoo. But that’s another conversation for another time. Sigh.) But most of all, this movie has geeky scientists willing to experiment on themselves (read use the love potion) for the greater good of humanity! 

It’s FOR SCIENCE. 

Here’s what I love about this movie: It takes the simple premise of wishing there was a magical potion that would make a person more attractive to potential partners, here the opposite sex, since this is a very 90s het-cis movie. All dating anxiety vanishes because you don’t have to be funny, or sexy, or even all that interesting to be attractive as the narrator explains. You just have to open your potion-coated mouth and—voilà!—you’ve cast a love spell on whoever you desire.

The protagonists, Paul (Tate Donovan) and Diane (Sandra Bullock), are also very relatable in their search for love. Diane is in a terrible “situationship” with Gary, which is really more of a string of booty calls.  Paul can't seem to approach women without breaking into hives (thankfully this movie deals with his shyness without sliding into incel territory).  

The plot twist?  These two nerdy scientists are actually perfect for each other if they could just get out of their own way long enough to see it.  Instead, they end up being partners in crime, studying the effects of the love potion Paul got from the gypsy and, frankly, enjoying the new power they have in being desirable with a spray that’s the equivalent of a romantic breath mint. It’s literally that simple: Spray the magic into your mouth, speak, and the lovers will follow. The only catch is that this love potion only lasts four hours.

So this isn’t like Teen Witch or other movies that feature one protagonist using love magic on one person to artificially win their love. Instead, they both indulge in the fantasy of their hearts’ desires but never with each other. In fact, they make it a point never to speak to one another when they are “under the influence” of this magical potion.  It’s perhaps the only rule they adhere to so that neither feels disempowered by the other.  

There’s a fun intimacy that develops between the two since they are the only ones who know the secret to their romantic success…and it really goes to show that all they needed was a little confidence and a playful spirit to get what they really wanted: each other.

But before we can get to their HEA, we have a lot of fun reveling in many a romantic fantasy, the biggest being Diane’s make-over.  In a way that only Sandra Bullock can pull off (okay, and Audrey Hepburn and Anne Hathaway), Diane goes from a frumpy nerd to a sexy and beautiful confident woman. Yeah, it’s a problematic trope but I’m a sucker for it! 

Diane dates a rich man and then a prince, both of whom shower her in gifts, from jewels and fancy dresses to her complete cosmetic makeover. And while there are consumerist underpinnings to these fantasies, there’s also this sense that Diane is, for perhaps the first time, being appreciated, cared for, and adored.  She is literally fulfilling many a stereotypical romance fantasy, right down to getting your tool of an ex to realize just how great you are.

Paul, on the other hand, epitomizes a very human revenge fantasy. He makes a woman who publicly and painfully rejected him do everything she can to make him hers. This scene stays on the right side of funny because the woman was truly awful and went out of her way to publicly humiliate him during their first encounter when he did nothing but be his awkward self. He also doesn’t sleep with her. He just rejects her and does a happy dance in the street afterward. It’s a great scene that keeps him from falling into the creepy nice guy territory. Then he does some typical sex fantasy stuff worthy of any porno—the sorority house orgy being the highlight.

And yet, what all these fantasies do in this movie is highlight that what really matters is genuine affection and love, as we see when the two protagonists get together and fall madly in love simply by being themselves without the help of a potion.  In fact, the real magic this potion works is helping them relax enough to actually talk and get to know one another.

The second half of the movie does a great job of looking at the other side of this gypsy-gifted potion when Gary exacts his revenge on Diane by hitting her with some of the love potion.  After a non-potion-induced magical time with Paul, she suddenly decides to return to Gary and, in fact, plans to marry him. Then Paul gets whammied too when a prostitute and petty criminal hits him with the love potion and strips him of his valuables.  

It’s all fun and games when you’re the one using the love option, but it’s actually kind of scary and awful when someone is using it on you! 

Paul realizes that he never wants to be on the receiving end of that kind of magic—realizes, too, that’s how many of his conquests must feel, and how Diane would feel once she falls out from under Gary’s spell.  

In the end, Paul rescues Diane, they get their love—without the potion. Oh, and the prostitute gets doused in the stuff and has her fun with a hoard of men at her beck and call, a reminder that we can still have fun with this love potion trope while also realizing that the ephemeral thing we want—love—can’t be bottled or commodified.

I wished for you, too…

On the flip side of Love Potion No. 9’s manufactured romance, we have Practical Magic (another Bullock classic). Little Sally’s love spell is perhaps the best example in pop culture of what this bruja would call an ethical love spell.

By this point in the movie, Sally knows her mother died of a broken heart and the women in her family are cursed to be unhappy in love. She’s even witnessed her aunts help more than a few lovesick women with their magic.  Her sister Gillian can’t wait to experience love. Sally, on the other hand, is terrified of what it might do to her.
So she does what any witch would do. She crafts a love spell.  As she collects white rose petals from her balcony and a variety of other ingredients, she lists all the traits of an impossible love in the way only a young girl can. He must be able to ride a horse backward, flip pancakes in the air, be incredibly kind. His favorite shape must be a start. And he should have one green eye and one blue.  

When Gillian exclaims that those traits are impossible, Sally replies, “That’s the point. The guy I dreamed up doesn’t exist. If he doesn't exist, I won’t die of a broken heart.”

But he does exist. 

Later in the movie, we meet Gary (this time a good Gary), who is a sheriff looking for Gillian’s evil—and dead—ex.  He can flip pancakes. He has one green eye and one blue eye.  And his sheriff’s badge is in the shape of a star, so it isn’t a reach to assume he likes the shape a lot. 

Of course, Sally being Sally, she doesn’t trust that their attraction is real. She fears her spell is the only thing making him want to stay, in the same way her aunts bespelled her to fall in love earlier in the film.  She’s also afraid of the curse that will once again break her heart.

This is the point of the film where Gary works a little magic of his own. 

He tells Sally, “Curses only have power when you believe in them and I don’t.” 

As any witch will tell you, belief is half of the battle when it comes to conjuring—or breaking—spells.

And then he goes on to say, “You know what? I wished for you, too.”

*pauses to dry eyes before continuing to type*

That’s a pivotal moment in the movie because it tells Sally—and the viewer—that it’s not just Sally working her magic. Love is its own ungovernable force, its own kind of magic that even the most mundane human can conjure.  So their meeting is pure synchronous magic not just because Sally wished for him but because he wished for her, too.

SWOON.

It’s romantic conjuring at its finest: When you want someone—even if you don’t know who they are yet—that you cast that energy out into the universe and open yourself to the possibility of the thing.  Even young Sally didn’t realize what she was conjuring with her original love spell.  Consciously she might have been trying to protect herself from heartbreak. Unconsciously? She wanted a love so strong—something that seemed so unreal to her at the time—that it would help her break the love curse on the Owen’s women.  No more curse, no more heartbreak.

That’s how the universe works: You wish for what you think you want and it gives you what you need.  Sally’s spell did protect her from future romantic heartbreak not because this dream man didn’t exist, but because Gary and his love helped Sally to break the generational cycle of generational trauma. If that doesn’t make you swoon or sign or even cry a little, then there’s no help for you.

Love is its own kind of magic…

However you look at love magic in pop culture, one thing is for sure: Love is its own kind of magic, one you can’t control, quantify, or force. If this bruja is going to get a little After School Special about it, the best love magic is the kind that comes synchronously, naturally, when we allow ourselves to just be ourselves and let relationships develop out of mutual interest and a willingness to be vulnerable and open.  Also pants feelings! Easier said than done, of course.  All you have to do is Google “dating tips” or open any lifestyle magazine to get 100 tips on how to be sexy or get the one you want—or think you want. I mean, sometimes the person you’re lusting after is more a bunch of projected fantasies in human form than a living breathing person you can actually connect with.  Other times, the one you’re looking for is right in front of you if you’d just be open to it.

Let’s face it, if love were easy, we’d all have it.  Which is what makes love magic so damn tempting.  Sally’s kind of love magic is something we all aspire to (if you’re romantically inclined). But it’s a lot harder to cast and takes longer to be fulfilled.  

As for a potion that can lower your inhibitions and make you desirable to others? 

It’s called alcohol. That, too, only lasts about four hours.

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!

Joyful Problematization with Andrea Martucci

I’d like to start today’s post with an important clarity exercise. First, find a comfortable position and get settled. Then focus on your breath. Breathe in, breathe out. Keep doing that until you feel your body and mind relax. Then repeat the following phrase in sync with your breathing until the message sinks in:

There’s no such this as an unproblematic text.

There’s no such this as an unproblematic text.

There’s no such this as an unproblematic text.

There. Now, don’t you feel better? If not, repeated this exercise until you do.

In all seriousness, I think one of the hardest parts of participating in any fandom is recognizing that all stories GOTZ PROBLEMS. But that doesn’t mean you still can love and appreciate the narratives and spaces that speak to you (within reason—I seriously do not understand people who read and write Nazi-redemption romances, for example, and if that makes me a judge bruja, then so be it).

I say this with a deep and passionate love for genre fiction and media of all kinds. There are some truly powerful things about pop culture and the stories that inspire and are inspired by it—and also some truly terrible things. In all the genres I teach, read, and write about, primarily gothic and romance—I frame them as magical spaces that center social justice narratives. Traditionally silenced voices have space to sing in these genres. Oppression and injustice are brought into the light. Those of use with historically marginalized identities are placed front and center, and the protagonists that get to wrestle with conflict, be flawed human beings, but still, come out the other side as whole, complete, fulfilled individuals. We can even get our HEA.

BUT I also teach these same genres as spaces that reinforce toxic social norms. The gothic is rife with villains who are queered, racialized, or demonized for their class or ability. The romance genre, for as radical as it can be in promising HEAs for everyone, can also be a white-supremacist’s wonderland that strategically excludes people with marginalized identities from narratives of joy.

See what I’m getting at here? More often than not, one genre, one text, one type of media is doing both those things at once. Let’s take, for example, Cristina Rosetti’s Goblin Market. This luscious fairytale of a poem is at once an erotic ode to sapphic romance in its coded representation of sisterly love AND an antisemitic treatise in its depiction of evil goblin money hoarders bend on destroying two innocent girls. So it’s at once deeply progressive for its time and deeply conservative. Yet, I love the poem. I love reading it. I love teaching it. I love how it inspires me to write sexy fairytale imagery in my own creative work—and reminds me not to use goblins as a code for antisemitic rhetoric, like so many fantasy novels do (*cough cough* Harry Potter *cough cough*).

At the end of the day, it’s not about reading only the purest of texts—there’s no such thing and I’m leery of anyone who virtue signals their performatively “woke” reading lists. Those lists, themselves, are sites of problematic content rooted in racism, classism, ableism, & heteronormativity…and a whole bunch of other -isms I have likely forgotten to list. What matters is how we engage with and contextualize that material.

So…how do we engage with media? By joyfully problematizing it, of course! I like to situate a text within its historical, social, and cultural context to get emotional distance from it. I ask the following:

  • What cultural, historical, and/or social moment produced this text?

  • What is it saying about said cultural, historical, and/or cultural moment?

  • What biases do we have in our own consumption?

  • How are we products of our own cultural, historical, and/or social moment & how does that shape what/how we consume media?

As for the rest, I leave you in the capable hands of Andrea Martucci, the host of Shelf Love, a podcast and community dedicated to the joyful problematization of romantic stories in popular culture. She has kindly made us an infographic to guide us through our (joyful!) analysis of media.

Dr. Sam Hirst also offers a loving and critical examination of the complicated legacy of Georgette Heyer if you’re looking for an excellent example of joyful problematization (aside from every single episode of Shelf Love Podcast). Likewise, check out Adrienne’s epic exploration of Elizabeth Gaskell’s North & South in terms of class conflict, romance, and passionate fandoms.

In closing, I’d like to offer another phrase to the above breathing exercise, one I’d close out your meditation exercise with:

It’s okay to enjoy problematic content, as long as you don’t pretend it isn’t problematic.

It’s also okay to leave behind media that’s too problematic for personal consumption.

Guest Contributor Bio

Andrea Martucci is the host of Shelf Love, a podcast and community that critically examines the meaning and structure of romantic love stories in pop culture. Andrea's conversations with academics and genre lovers share pop culture criticism that is joyful and accessible. Shelf Love has released nearly 100 episodes since its launch in 2019. In 2021, Andrea presented a paper at the Popular Culture Association on her quantitative research exploring how Bridgerton on Netflix impacted popular perceptions of romance novel readers. Andrea is two-time alum of Emerson College in Boston who has worked in publishing and marketing for over a decade.

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!

Welcome to The Bruja Professor…

Welcome to The Bruja Professor…

A witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture!

This is the corner of my website where I share articles, insights, and other resources to help fellow story lovers explore the world of literature and popular culture through an intersectional lens. I’ll be writing about the genres that most nourish me as a writer and bruja while hosting like-minded magical nerdy folk to share their expertise on the genres and lifestyles we love.  

So if you like spooky stuff, bodice rippers, witchy business, and occult detectives, look no further than The Bruja Professor for lively conversations about the stories that make our lives more magical. 

Guiding Philosophy

Here we believe that our shared love of stories, fandoms, and genres can be a numinous experience. This inclusive space celebrates the fundamental magic of stories—what we write, what we read, what we watch, what we talk about—and how they shape us as magical beings.  

And yes, to shamelessly quote the film Practical Magic, there’s a little witch in all of us. Stories help us tap into that numinous energy.  As any book lover can tell you, there’s something transformative, enchanting even, about a story’s ability to heal, revive, empower, terrify, and inspire.  

My witchy practice is also all about social justice, so you’ll see me and fellow contributors breaking down what I call the ordinary gothic side of the genres we love, you know, the casual racism, sexism, homophobia, ableism, xenophobia, etc. that we can normalize when we don’t explicitly and directly address those issues.

Sometimes, we are so used to seeing those terrible -isms in the media that we consume that we read right past them…terrifying! Hence, it’s ordinary gothic, the thing that is all the more shocking for how we normalize it. We’re invested in dragging these things into the light so they can’t feed on the shadows—it’s one way of breaking the cycles of systemic oppression. Just another day in the life of a bruja.

Also, you might be wondering who this ‘we’ is in The Bruja Professor.  That’s me and my familiar, Smoke.  He’s my editor.  Nothing gets posted on this website unless it’s familiar approved. 

The Magic of Dynamic Discussion 

The Bruja Professor is all about fun and engaging explorations and yes, problematization, of the genres we love.  It should be a joy to learn and discover new ways of looking at the world. And we should be able to happily unpack and dismantle systemic oppression by becoming more self-aware and informed consumers and creators. 

That’s why this space is devoted to dynamic, complex discussions about the stories that shape us, in good ways, in bad ways, in complex ways, with the fundamental knowledge that there’s no such thing as a perfect story, only stories that deeply affect us.  This blog embraces the magical intersection between social justice, intellectual curiosity, and the love of storytelling in all forms. 

So, to recap, here’s everything you need to know about The Bruja Professor:

What it is…

A magical virtual salon where we can joyfully explore the complicated and wonderful world of storytelling, from the delightful to the dreadful. Here the personal is political (trite but true), storytelling is political AND personal, as is our relationship to the stories we consume.  This space celebrates inclusive, intersectional explorations of literature, the occult, and popular culture. 

This is also a safe space for those of us with marginalized identities.  Anyone violating that will be hexed.

What it isn’t…

This isn’t a place to roast internet trolls (however much they deserve it) or blithely and uncritically wax poetic about stories and genres that, to put it mildly, GOTZ PROBLEMS.  Nor is it a place to share academic treaties (sorry, there’s other venues for that!) or snooze-worthy diatribes on [fill in the blank].  Don’t get me wrong—we want people to gush about their passions in an informed and thoughtful way, just don’t be so formal about it!

Lastly, I feel like I need to say this since we will be discussing witchy and occult stuff from time to time, but this is not a space where we will accidentally post ancient Latin spells (lifted from the internet, naturally) which could accidentally summon a demon or resurrect an ancient spirit bent on world domination.  Let’s leave that stuff for the B horror movies and campy occult detective shows.  Now those, we’ll talk about.  

As for those ancient spells, you might go looking for on the internet…just don’t.  It never ends well. 

MagicShelf_Small.jpg

The Bruja Professor, a witchy take on literature, the occult & pop culture, is the scholarly sister to Enchantment Learning & Living, an inspirational blog celebrating life’s simple pleasures, everyday mysticism, and delectable recipes that are guaranteed to stir the kitchen witch in you.

If you enjoyed what you just read and believe that stories are magic & true magic is in the everyday…or your next good read, subscribe to my newsletter below for regular doses of enchantment.

Want even more inspiration? Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter. Here’s to a magical life!